by Tommy Fanning, IDA Ireland
The 29th of March next year is a critical date for U.S. biotech companies because business as usual disappears in Europe as a result of Brexit. Long a favored location for manufacturing and selling pharmaceuticals and devices across Europe, the United Kingdom will no longer be part of the EU and so free trade across Europe will change. American firms with UK operations should have already devised a post-Brexit strategy and begun implementing it given the fact that the changeover is just a few months away.
Pharmaceutical companies should be examining their supply chains, their manufacturing processes and most pointedly, their regulatory situation in order to prevent disruption in serving the 600-million-strong European market. To safeguard the continuous supply of human and veterinary medicines after March 29, U.S. companies need to transfer their marketing authorization to a legal entity in the EU along with the "qualified person" for pharmacovigilance (QPPV) or pharmacovigilance system master files (PSMF). This means establishing a batch release site outside the UK while changing existing logistics, contracts and other key elements in drug distribution. Similar changes need to be planned for raw materials used in pharmaceuticals if they come from or flow through the UK.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA), which was previous headquartered in London for over two decades, will move to Amsterdam and while U.S. pharmaceutical companies can still manufacture products in the UK after March 29, any testing will need to relocate elsewhere in Europe and these products will require batch release outside the UK to be sold in the EU market.
According to British pharmaceutical executives, 37 million packs of medicine now arrive in the UK from the EU monthly while 45 million packs travel the other way. The EMA's network of regulators keeps the process simple and efficient but there's no reason why U.S. biotech firms impacted by Brexit can't achieve a future system that works for them if they examine several key issues and make intelligent choices. Here are some major aspects to consider.
The first step is a close examination of the current functions located in the UK in light of how Brexit might require or suggest a new site. Most pharma companies have strong existing teams in the UK with leading experts and proven talent. However, many American firms are taking stock of where they already have facilities outside the UK, perhaps in countries with large markets such as Germany, France, Ireland or Italy. Such companies have already come to realize that choosing a new location for their marketing authorizations is the best way to ensure that consumers still get their medications as quickly and easily as possible. Initially, it may be a satellite team that is set up, rather than replicating an entire team, which will over time become more important to the company’s strategy. Perhaps relocating manufacturing makes sense, as well.
However, any relocation task is complex and particularly so for pharmaceutical firms with their knotty regulatory requirements as well as considerations for advanced manufacturing expertise, availability of trained personnel and other factors. When looking at a potential new site, choose a location that has solid expertise and a background in manufacturing thus giving companies access to many of the skills required for monitoring, measuring and launching products into the European Union framework.
Moving marketing authorizations and regulatory functions from one country to another can be a complex process that varies widely depending on the corporate and regulatory structures in the company. Meanwhile, each of the 26 EU countries has its own regulatory body with its own approach in engaging with companies that are changing their regulatory structures in response to Brexit. According to Rita Purcell, deputy chief executive of the Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA) in Ireland and someone who is savvy about how such organizations operate in Europe, "It's important to be aware of how advanced a regulator's planning is about Brexit and their approach to facilitating the easy, successful move of marketing authorizations, batch release sites and other regulatory functions.
"HPRA consider that they have a reputation for being strong but fair in working with drug firms. We work closely with companies to help them resolve issues while also being committed to maintaining suitable standards and quality," she said. While the regulatory and compliance rules are the same across the EU, stakeholder engagement may be different and she encourages an approach of early engagement, which is in the best interests of both companies and regulators.
A significant issue for American pharma companies are the regulations in the home country for any drugs manufactured in a firm's European facility. For example, the HPRA has been recognized by the FDA via an EU mutual-recognition agreement and thus any Irish manufacturing sites only need, in most cases, a HPRA inspection before products can be sold in the United States. Companies should check to see if the country they are considering also has FDA recognition.
Given the high number of American pharma companies that have Irish sites, this nation has long had a rich hiring environment for biotech. However, other European countries also have skilled workers and Purcell from the HPRA suggests assessing if a site under consideration will have an adequate available workforce.
In addition to the process engineers, validation engineers, quality control professionals and laboratory technicians that work in biotech, far-sighted companies should also examine the supply of professionals with digital and IT skills to staff the industry's increasingly automated manufacturing plants. Purcell suggests that companies also look at the supply of skilled workers in areas like medical affairs, medical writing, regulatory affairs and clinical trial management in their chosen location.
Not all segments of the biotech industry will be disrupted by Brexit. Fortunately, companies making medical devices sold in Europe will have fewer issues because EMA regulators aren't responsible for devices but rather for medications. Once a CE mark has been obtained, the device can be marketed anywhere in Europe without engaging individual national authorities.
However, U.S. pharma companies that want the smoothest post-Brexit transition need to have a well-thought-out strategy in place now and not wait until it's too late for implementation.
You'll find us responsive to your needs, proactive, professional and willing to go the extra mile.
We have 28 Offices worldwide helping support companies expand their operations in Ireland.
To consent to the use of ALL cookies click “I Accept”. You may visit Cookies Preference to manage which cookies we may use.